In 2023, many ASJ authors make outstanding contributions to our journal. Their articles published with us have received very well feedback in the field and stimulate a lot of discussions and new insights among the peers.
Hereby, we would like to highlight some of our outstanding authors who have been making immense efforts in their research fields, with a brief interview of their unique perspective and insightful view as authors.
Outstanding Authors (2023)
Savvas Lampridis, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guy’s Hospital, UK
Dragana Jovanovic, Internal Medicine Clinic “Akta Medica”, Serbia
Monika K. Masanam, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, USA
Edward L. Barawid, UC Irvine Health, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, USA
Fernando A. M. Herbella, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
Wai Yan Yuen, Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand
Savvas Lampridis
Dr. Savvas Lampridis, MD, MSc, MRCS(Ed), received his medical training at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and the Military Medical Academy of Greece. He subsequently received his training in cardiothoracic surgery in Greece and the UK, including the Royal Brompton Hospital and the University College London Hospitals. After completing his specialty training, he worked at the 424 General Military Hospital in Greece, as well as at Guy’s and Hammersmith Hospitals in London, UK. Dr. Lampridis completed two master degrees with distinction, one in Translational Cardiovascular Medicine and the other in Health Policy and Planning. He is a member of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. He is also a member of the editorial board of several peer-reviewed journals, and he has been a guest editor for multiple special issues. He has authored more than 50 publications, and he has peer-reviewed more than 250 articles, which have been published in more than 50 journals. Dr. Lampridis is also an avid medical educator; he has written teaching material and has organised various courses, ranging from basic surgical skills to advanced thoracic surgical techniques. Learn more about Dr. Lampridis from ORCID, Google Scholar or Web of Science. Connect with Dr. Lampridis on LinkedIn and Twitter.
As a researcher and author, Dr. Lampridis believes that the key skill sets of an author go beyond just the ability to write well. To be a successful author in the medical field, one must possess a combination of competences and qualities that allow them to effectively communicate their ideas and findings in a manner that is clear, concise, and engaging. First and foremost, an author should have a deep understanding of the subject matter he or she is writing about. Whether writing about unpublished research, novel medical technologies, new surgical techniques, or any other topics, a thorough knowledge of the subject is essential to producing high-quality work. This requires not only an extensive understanding of the relevant literature, but also a willingness to remain updated on the latest developments in the field, as well as an ability to critically evaluate and synthesize the available information. Another important skill for an author is the capability to effectively communicate complex ideas to a wide range of audiences. This requires the capacity to translate technical jargon and complex concepts into language that is easily understandable to a non-expert reader. Furthermore, authors must be able to tailor their writing style to the specific audience they are targeting, whether it be fellow surgeons, medical students, or the general public. In addition to these technical skills, successful authors must possess several personal qualities that are essential to the writing process. These include a strong work ethic, discipline, and perseverance. Writing can be a time-consuming and often frustrating process, and authors must be able to maintain their focus and motivation even when facing with challenges or setbacks. Moreover, an author should be able to think creatively and outside the box, particularly when it comes to developing novel research questions and study designs. This demands not only an eagerness to take risks and explore new avenues of research, but also a strong foundation in scientific methodology and statistical analysis. Finally, Dr. Lampridis believes that a passion for the studied subject is essential to producing high-quality work as an author. Without a genuine interest and enthusiasm for the topic at hand, it can be difficult to maintain the level of dedication and attention to details required to produce truly impactful writing.
Dr. Lampridis further mentions that avoiding biases in one's writing is crucial for maintaining scientific rigor and ensuring that research findings are accurate and reliable. As a researcher, he believes that there are several strategies that authors can employ to minimize the risk of bias in their writing. First, authors should strive to maintain objectivity by relying on empirical evidence to support their arguments and avoiding personal opinions. It also means being transparent about potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding, which can influence the interpretation of research findings. Authors should also be aware of the potential for unconscious biases to creep into their writing. This can be particularly challenging in the medical field, where researchers may hold implicit biases related to factors such as race, gender, or socioeconomic status. To minimize the risk of unconscious bias, authors can use standardized data collection methods, blind data analysis, and other techniques that help to remove subjective interpretation from the research process. Another important strategy for avoiding biases is to engage in peer review and constructive criticism. By seeking out feedback from colleagues and other experts in the field, authors can identify potential biases or weaknesses in their research and take steps to address them before publication. Ultimately, avoiding biases in one's writing requires a commitment to scientific integrity and a willingness to engage in ongoing self-reflection and critique.
Dr. Lampridis is constantly inspired by the dedication and hard work of academic writers who are devoting themselves to advancing scientific progress. Their contributions to the field of medicine are invaluable, and he believes that their work has the potential to make a real difference in the lives of patients around the world. Every study, every paper, every contribution they make to the medical literature helps to build a more complete and nuanced understanding of human health and disease, as well as to develop new and innovative treatments and interventions. Dr. Lampridis points out that academic writing can be challenging at times, and the demands of research and publication can be daunting. He would like to encourage academic writers to maintain a strong sense of purpose for the work and to continue pushing oneself to learn and grow as a writer and researcher. He adds, “Remember that we are not alone in this journey. There is a vibrant community of medical researchers and writers out there who are just as passionate as we are. Reach out to colleagues and mentors for support and guidance, and do not be afraid to ask for help when in need. Above all, never lose sight of the importance of our work. The medical knowledge and insights that we are contributing to the field have the potential to save lives and improve health outcomes for countless individuals worldwide.”
Finally, on the importance of applying for institutional review board (IRB) approval for research studies, Dr. Lampridis would like not to overemphasize it. The IRB is an independent committee that is responsible for reviewing and approving all research studies involving human subjects. Its primary role is to ensure that the rights and welfare of participants are protected, and that studies are conducted in an ethical and responsible manner. He explains that applying for IRB approval is important for several reasons. First and foremost, it is a legal and ethical requirement for all research studies involving human subjects. Failing to obtain IRB approval can result in serious legal and ethical consequences, including the potential loss of funding, the suspension of research activities, and even legal liability for human harm. In addition to these legal and ethical considerations, obtaining IRB approval also helps to ensure the scientific integrity and credibility of a study. The IRB review process involves a rigorous evaluation of the study design, methodology, and informed consent procedures, which can help to identify potential flaws or limitations in the study and ensure that it is conducted in a responsible and scientifically rigorous manner. Finally, applying for IRB approval is important for building trust and confidence with patients and communities. By demonstrating a commitment to ethical and responsible research practices, investigators can foster positive relationships that can facilitate future research collaborations.
(by Masaki Lo, Brad Li)
Álvaro Fuentes-Martín
Dr. Álvaro Fuentes-Martín is a thoracic surgeon currently completing his final year of residency at the University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, Spain. He obtained his MD from the Complutense University in Madrid. Driven by a passion for advancing healthcare, he is currently pursuing his PhD in Health Science Research at the University of Valladolid. He has actively contributed to the field of thoracic surgery through his interest in academic and surgical training. He serves as a board member of the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery and coordinates the Residents Committee within the society. Additionally, he is a vocal member of the National Commission for Thoracic Surgery Specialty in the Ministry of Health. His research interests encompass various aspects of thoracic surgery, including the development of new minimally invasive techniques, particularly in lung cancer. He has published numerous articles in renowned medical journals and has contributed to book chapters on particular subject. Connect with Dr. Fuentes-Martín on LinkedIn, Twitter or ResearchGate.
Dr. Fuentes-Martín thinks as physicians, what motivates them to continue researching and communicate their findings in scientific publications is the desire to contribute to the advancement of medicine and ultimately improve patient care. “Clinical practice already requires a significant amount of time and effort, especially for physicians in training, but I believe that the academic sphere is an integral part of our profession. Through academic writing, we share our clinical and surgical experiences, measure, analyze, and compare our results, allowing us to improve the quality of care. Furthermore, it provides us with an opportunity to share knowledge, collaborate with other experts, and foster personal growth as well as the professional development in the field of our specialization,” shares he.
When preparing a paper, Dr. Fuentes-Martín points out several essential points that authors must consider. Firstly, they should contextualize their research, emphasizing its relevance and purpose, and ensuring that it contributes to their specialized field. Once the objective is established, authors should strive for methodological rigor, presenting results accurately and objectively. He emphasizes that it is important to be honest in interpreting the findings, acknowledging limitations and discussing clinical implications before drawing conclusions. “Maintaining data confidentiality and declaring conflicts of interest (COIs) are ethical standards that all authors must adhere to,” says he.
On the disclosure of COI, Dr. Fuentes-Martín thinks it is crucial for authors to do so in their research. “Disclosing COIs is essential to maintain credibility in scientific publications, as it allows us to evaluate potential biases in the research. The extent to which a COI can influence a scientific study varies greatly and depends on the nature and magnitude of the conflict. Financial conflicts, such as receiving funding from pharmaceutical companies, can introduce biases that affect the study design, data interpretation, and/or conclusions. However, it is important to note that the mere existence of a COI does not invalidate the results of a research study. Reflecting on these COIs allows the scientific community, including journal reviewers, to assess the research and maintain the integrity of scientific publications,” Dr. Fuentes-Martín explains.
(by Masaki Lo, Brad Li)
Dragana Jovanovic
Dr. Dragana Jovanovic is the Professor of Pulmonology/Thoracic Oncology, Past Head of the Thoracic Oncology and Founder Head of Palliative Medicine at the School of Medicine of the Belgrade University, Serbia. She has been working at the University Hospital of Pulmonology, Clinical Center of Serbia since 2020. She also works at the Private Internal Medicine Clinic “Akta Medica” in Belgrade. Her research interests focus on thoracic oncology primarily; there is an ongoing project on certain aspects of NSCLC. She has been the author/co-author in over 370 papers, nearly 100 chapters in several books, and is the chief editor/author of 7 books. She participates actively in several large international projects, such as the “ERS Task Forces on Thoracic Oncology and Palliative Care”. She is also the reviewer of several journals, and being the Editorial Board Member of JTD. She has got plenty of experience in being the Organizer/Chair/(invited) Lecturer of numerous national and international congresses, CME conferences and courses dealing with Thoracic Oncology, mostly on lung cancer. She has been the ERS College of Experts Member since 2016, ERS LRPC 2018-2020, Senior Faculty Member of the College of the ESO 2020-2022 and Member of Royal Medical Board.
Speaking of a good academic paper, Dr. Jovanovic thinks it is one that includes all important information and up-to-date advancement on a related topic (anchored on a sound research question), using relevant data and with proper methods for data analysis. She explains, “Its sole purpose might be creating or further expanding the valuable knowledge if it tends to be strictly theoretically focused, whereas the applied, professional research is more focused on finding solutions to important, and most of the time, practical problems. However, the paper should be able to achieve some representative and generalizable conclusions, thus paving the way for future research. The must is that all findings are evaluated through a peer-review process. Good research is replicable, reproducible, and transparent, as well as respecting ethical standards. As for the essential elements of a good academic paper, the starting point is a sound research question, followed by a systematic, appropriate research methodology, collecting relevant data and applying appropriate methods for data analysis. The next important point is adequate discussion with corresponding conclusions, acknowledging limitations and providing suggestions for future research. External validity is an important component, and if applicable, the results/findings can be applied to the real world.”
Dr. Jovanovic puts forward the following points that she believes authors have to bear in mind during preparation of a paper: First, we have to consider if what we would like to write about is of something new and interesting, or that it might contribute to updating knowledge on the related topic, and we have to check the latest results in the field as well. Then, it is necessary to make sure that the findings have been verified by appropriate analysis with its significance being verified as well; that the methods/measurements are valid and reliable, and to be ready to describe the scope and limitations of the methods as well. Also, we have to carefully check if the work is directly related to a current hot topic, and what would be the contribution of the findings to that topic or if solutions are provided to any difficult problems. And of course, authors have to strictly follow the journal guidelines. Besides, it would be very useful to get insight in generic instructions for reviewers as well. After we have written the paper, we have to check if the appropriate scheme (the structure) is being followed, the correctness of statistics and data, validity of claims in the discussion and conclusions, and clarity of work presentation.
Data sharing is prevalent in scientific writing in recent years. Dr. Jovanovic believes that is almost the only way, or the only real way to disseminate knowledge and research ideas across the world, to reach worldwide medicine communities regardless of healthcare systems, drug availability or other issues. “Advancing or at least updating the knowledge leads to improvement in management of disease in every sense. Disseminating scientific research achievements enables further innovative scientific research as well,” says she.
(by Masaki Lo, Brad Li)
Monika K. Masanam
Dr. Monika K. Masanam, MD, is currently a chief resident physician completing her residency in General Surgery at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital in Washington, DC, US. She earned her undergraduate degree in Biological Sciences from Rutgers University where she was awarded the prestigious Presidential Scholarship and received her medical degree from Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School through a joint 7-year bachelor and medical degree program. After residency, she plans to continue her surgical training by pursuing a fellowship in Breast Surgical Oncology. She serves in physician leadership roles as Co-Chair of the Medical Society of DC Women in Medicine Section, a member of the Association of Women Surgeons Outreach Committee, and the Resident and Associate Society Liaison to the American College of Surgeons Board of Governors Surgical Training Workgroup. Her clinical and research interests include cancer genomics, high-risk breast cancer patients, and breast cancer disparities. Connect with Dr. Masanam on Twitter.
Dr. Masanam regards academic writing as the thread that connects the fabric of science. She explains, “Science is advanced by the sharing of knowledge and communication of new findings through writing. In the field of medicine, physician scientists seek to not only advance medical knowledge by addressing clinical questions but also improve current clinical practices. Scientific publications in medicine have served as guides for physicians in providing health care for patients that is rooted in scientific evidence. Evidence-based medicine has transformed the landscape of surgery and resulted in radical changes to the way that we diagnose and treat surgical patients. Through academic writing, authors may contribute to the existing body of literature by sharing new perspectives and offering innovative solutions that continue to push the needle forward.”
Dr. Masanam admits that bias may occur during multiple stages when writing an academic paper. Yet, studies should be designed to minimize bias by utilizing standardized outcome measures, validated risk stratification models, and protocols for data collection. She mentions some additional measures such as blinding and randomization in trials would reduce the risk of observer and selection biases. During the writing process, she thinks authors should report results in an objective manner and provide statistical significance when relevant. Arguments should be supported by empirical evidence and care should be taken to avoid highly subjective statements based on opinions. She adds, “Implicit bias related to factors such as age, disability, gender or socioeconomic status is inevitable in the field of medicine. When writing academic papers, one may reduce bias by choosing precise language with a focus on relevant characteristics, being sensitive to the use of labels, and avoiding stigmatizing any groups. Engaging in peer review is another key measure in identifying and addressing potential bias in a research paper prior to publication. Understanding biases and their impact on scientific studies is critical in the scientific process and the practice of evidence-based medicine.”
Finally, on the topic of research data sharing in scientific writing, Dr. Masanam believes that is crucial for scientific progress. She says, “With increasing availability of data in scientific studies, researchers allow for full transparency in their work, validation of experimental results and reproducibility. In addition, data sharing is an opportunity for researchers to collaborate with other scholars. Publication of data facilitates open conversation among research teams and enables researchers to perform larger scale analyses in future studies.”
(by Masaki Lo, Brad Li)
Edward L. Barawid
Dr. Edward L. Barawid is an Assistant Clinical Professor for the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation residency program at the University of California, Irvine, US. He is double board-certified in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Pain Medicine. Currently, he is a staff physician with the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System in Long Beach, California. He has research interests in prolotherapy and has several case reports which were presented at the Association of Academic Physiatrists annual meeting the past few years. He is planning a double-blind study comparing prolotherapy to placebo treating patellofemoral pain syndrome and tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis using a novel technique.
A good academic paper and its essential elements, to Dr. Barawid, consist of a clearly written thesis statement, being organized (and easily to follow), being insightful, and presenting strong arguments which are well supported by evidence.
Academic writing often involves evidence synthesis. On selecting the appropriate evidence for synthesis and analysis, Dr. Barawid believes authors should consider the audience (what is already known or what is essential for them to know), be specific and explain arguments or disagreements, be fair as to incorporate both evidence which may support or refute their hypothesis, and be concise. Authors should also bear in mind to use a variety of resources, take notes and create an outline, create multiple drafts and continuously revise.
In addition, Dr. Barawid is a supporter of research data sharing, as he believes in full transparency. He explains, “The goal of research, in my opinion, is to enhance and improve the quality of life for others. To be able to clearly analyze the data to further support or even refute an author’s claims is important in refining the related information and conclusions. This may be important to ensure the quality of the data. It also ensures reproducibility and facilitates collaboration. Additionally, one may further incorporate the data into new and insightful research of their own.”
(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)
Fernando A. M. Herbella
Dr. Herbella holds a degree in Medicine from Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil, the institution where he also did a residency in General Surgery and Surgical Gastroenterology and obtained his master's degree, PhD, post-doctorate and habilitation. Now, he is an Associate Professor, Advisor Professor of the Graduate Program in Interdisciplinary Surgical Science and Assistant Surgeon. He did a research fellowship in Esophageal Physiology and Surgery at the University of California, San Francisco, and a research fellowship in Esophageal Physiology and Surgery from the University of Rochester. He has more than 300 papers published, as well as 87 book chapters and 5 edited books. He is part of the editorial board of 10 journals and the guest reviewer of 210. He has supervised 1 post-doctorate, 8 doctoral theses and 15 master's theses. His main focus of research is on the physiology and surgery of the foregut. Follow Dr. Herbella on Instagram.
The fast growth and the continuing change in knowledge are the challenges for researchers. In Dr. Herbella’s opinion, authors must be aware of this pace. From the beginning of the research, authors must select a topic that is currently of interest. Before writing the protocol, the methodology must be checked for updates and new technology. After data collection, results must be analyzed and discussed in light of current knowledge. Journals also have the obligation to provide an adequate time for publication.
On the other hand, Dr. Herbella stresses that it is very important for authors to disclose Conflict of Interest (COI). He explains, “It is not prohibited for authors to have a COI. You may own the patent of a device you created that constitutes a COI, but you certainly want to show how good or accurate your device is. COI is an honest way to show this financial tie. Honest researchers with a compromise with truth would not be affected by this COI. The readers, however, should be aware of this tie and be aware that not all researchers may be honest and COI may alter results.”
(by Brad Li, Alisa Lu)
Wai Yan (Rachel) Yuen
Dr. Wai Yan Yuen completed her medical training at the University of Auckland. She is currently pursuing specialty training in the field of intensive care medicine and has done a small amount of research in this field surrounding neuroprognostication post-cardiac arrest. Her most recent research focuses include general surgery and genitourinary medical oncology. Her general surgery projects study biliary and hemorrhoidal disease. Her medical oncology projects study treatment pathways and outcomes in various subtypes of renal cell carcinomas. She is also involved in mentoring programs, driven by a passion for supporting young females in healthcare in reaching their full potential. Looking onward, she hopes to focus on research in the area of sports medicine, which incorporates her personal interests.
A good academic paper, according to Dr. Yuen, is one that offers clarity on the subject matter. There are undoubtedly a lot of topics that are intrinsically complicated, and when compounded with a structure and/or methodology that adds to the complexity, this can significantly limit how much readers are able to get out of it. A paper that succinctly highlights the implications of its findings, as well as the caveats of its research, are also hallmarks of what she considers to be a good academic paper.
Given the rapid advancements within medicine, Dr. Yuen believes that conferences are a good, condensed way of keeping up to date with new research ventures that are happening within her fields of interest. Equally, the process of taking note of deficits within current care pathways is also an important facet of using clinical experience to guide new research projects.
The process of creating something from scratch, creating something that can inspire and drive discussion, and being able to exchange ideas with clinicians and researchers from across the world are what Dr. Yuen finds the most fascinating and fulfilling aspects of academic writing. She quotes the famous words from Newton, “If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.” Academic writing is a community that feeds off the ideas of its predecessors and aims to progress collectively as a community through the ongoing exchange of ideas. And she finds herself very privileged to be able to be part of such a community.
Dr. Yuen continues, “In contrast to clinical medicine, academic writing offers some capacity to choose the problem that you want to solve as a writer, as opposed to trying to solve a problem that has been handed to you, which further adds to the satisfaction that comes from finishing a piece of academic writing.”
(by Brad Li, Alisa Lu)